Our Information Archive
Filter Categories
- Article 1
- BOEM 7
- Bill Thompson 5
- Biological Opinion 1
- Blog post 1
- Brochure 5
- CRMC 2
- Climate Change 3
- Commentary 9
- Construction and Operation Plan 3
- David Osborn 1
- Declaration 1
- Economics 2
- Endangered Species Act 1
- Environmental Impact Statement 9
- Environmental Laws 1
- Environmental Protection 4
- Evaluation 1
- Federal Registry 1
- Fishing 2
- Food safety 1
- Gover 1
- Government Document 18
- Green Oceans 7
- Green Oceans Submission 11
- Green Oceans White Paper 1
- Green Oceans blog 3
- Greenhouse Gases 1
- Human Health 2
- Humpback Whales 1
- IRS 1
- Incidental Take Requests 1
- Industry Paper 1
- Legal 1
- Legal Filing 1
- Letter 5
- Lisa Quattrocki Knight 8
- Literature Review 2
- Marine Environment 2
- Marine Mammal Protection Act 2
- Marine Mammals 4
- Mental Health 1
- NERC 1
- NOAA 5
- National Security 2
- News story 5
- Noise Pollution 6
- North Atlantic right whales 1
- North Sea Sperm whales 1
- Op Ed 1
Filter Tags
- Air Pollution 3
- Atlantic Cold Pool 2
- Atlantic Continental Shelf 1
- Atlantic Shores Project 1
- Author: Eve Zuckoff 1
- Author: Jim Shelton 1
- Avangrid 1
- Avoided emissions 1
- BOEM 13
- BPAs 3
- Baleen Whales 1
- Beacon Wind 1
- Big Wind 1
- Bill Thompson 4
- Biodiversity 2
- Biological Opinion 2
- Bloomberg News 1
- British Petroleum 1
- Buddy Vanderhoop 1
- CRMC 3
- Cargo Ship Traffic 1
- Charitable Organization 1
- Charter Boat Fishing 1
- Chief of Protected Species 1
- Climate Action RI 1
- Climate Change 9
- Cod spawning 1
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1
- Commentary 2
- Construction Emissions 1
- Construction and Operations Plan 2
- Construction details 2
- Cost of decommissioning 1
- Coxes Ledge 1
- Cybersecurity 1
- Danish Oil and Natural Gas 1
- David Osborn 1
- Decommissioning 2
- Departure request 1
- Draft Strategy on North Atlantic right whales and offshore wind 1
- EMFs 1
- Early Warning radar 1
- Early warning radar 3
- Economic costs 1
- Electricity Rates 2
- Enironmental Protection 1
- Environmental Disaster 1
- Environmental Impact 6
- Environmental Impact Assessment 4
- Environmental Impact Statement 6
Big Oil wants to be Big Wind
Can we trust the big oil companies just because they now want to build offshore wind?
Ørsted misrepresents visual simulations to the public
Ørsted only released the bottom images to the public and suppressed the top image of the same view in a “CONFIDENTIAL” appendix.
Coal gives Ørsted profit boost
Despite trying to “green-wash” their reputation, the multi-billion dollar danish energy giant, Ørsted, significantly profits from burning coal in 2022.
Miles Bidwell: The Myth of Offshore Wind
Miles Bidwell, PhD, and energy expert, explains why offshore wind will not reduce CO2 emissions.
Ørsted’s fact sheet on Revolution Wind never claims to help combat climate change.
Ørsted makes claims about providing for our energy needs, but never states the offshore wind project will help climate change. Ørsted boasts that the wind energy will offset future emissions, but empirical evidence does not support this claim.
Will Offshore Wind Help Climate Change?
The Environmental Impact Statements fail to scientifically prove any benefits to climate change.
The high cost of decommissioning
Decommissioning can cost 70% of the construction costs, according to this analysis from Europe. After fifteen years of operation, BOEM will only require Revolution Wind to put aside $325 million, when the likely cost of decommissioning could exceed $7 billion. Who will pay the difference?
The new modernization rule that benefits offshore wind companies, not citizens or the environment
The new modernization rule relieves developers, a multi billion dollar foreign energy giants, from the requirement to set aside financial bonds for decommissioning until after fifteen years of operation.